I would like to start by saying, no one critic is right. My personal philosophy is that everyone is a critic. Of course, every critic has their preferences.
Mine is predictability. If I feel like the music isn't challenging, or at least melodically interesting, I generally (and I use that term loosely) don't like it.
I believe that professional critics and writers often serve as "taste makers", if you will. Critics are generally people who put in the time and effort to study music and writing for years, so therefore they have a bit of more expertise in formulating an opinion.
Writers and musicians should be held to a standard. Writers are there to report and write truthfully, and musicians are there to produce quality music. One simply can not work without the other. However, I hate that music writers are often written off (no pun intended), as hacks who only want to write their personal opinions. The objective of good music writing has nothing to do with that.
When I got into music writing I became bombarded with a complex question:
If I become a music writer, what I am really contributing to society? I am basically some music geek who wants to write about bands that I like. That does not save lives and that does not change anything in the world I kept thinking. That also led me to the question why have music criticism at all?
Rock journalist Chuck Klosterman wrote in his memoir
Killing Yourself to Live, “Whenever people argue the importance of ‘[music] criticism’ –they are not arguing about [it]. They are arguing about the definition of the word important.” Some do not find reviews helpful –and logically so-- they have ears; they can hear and decide an opinion for themselves. If an album gets bad reviews does that mean the album will sell less? No, it will sell sometimes even more so than if it got bad reviews.
However, upon closer inspection I become conscious just how much music writing has to offer philosophically and culturally. I understood that with writing I could capture the essence of music for readers and reveal a meaning beyond its surface value. Writer Glenn McDonald echoed this sentiment in an interview with Claus.com, "I think the worthwhile thing you can [do]... is [to] write about how music moves you, about the ways you find to connect with it, and how you contrive to allow it to affect your understanding of the world or yourself.”
Chicago-based rock journalist and author, Jim DeRogatis once said, “Writing about music is writing about music, and it’s goddamn hard to...it’s easier to write about the history of the song or the background or the gossip…than it is to write about the music.” You must have an opinion when you are writing reviews and criticism. You must also empirically prove the reasoning for your opinion.
New York Times music critic, Jon Pareles said in an interview with RockCritics.com, "My job is… [to] tell the truth about it, offer a judgment, and give a sense what what’s behind that judgment. I feel it is your responsibly as a writer is to surpass the first, second, and third adjectives, and enlighten the reader." Music writers are a there to be a trusted opinion, the letting the chips fall where they may, and this responsibility at times comes at a hefty toll. Critics and journalists must write what they believe to be the
correct evaluation of the music.
Standing up to public opinion is another thing I believe that music writers must do relentlessly. Some writers have been blackballed for standing true to their music beliefs. In 1993, Jim DeRogatis wrote a piece in which he cited a Smashing Pumpkins song as having ‘sophomoric’ lyrics and this angered lead singer, Billy Corgan. On a live radiocast concert, Corgan referred to DeRogatis as “that fat fuck from the
Chicago Sun-Times.” Undeterred by Corgan’s resentment, DeRogatis reviewed the band by listening to their performance outside the concert venue. “I phoned in a report for the newspaper on deadline, and the notion that he could not control everything really got [Corgan] mad,” he wrote in his book
Milk It!.
As I ventured into music writing, it became important to me to discover what makes a good music writer. I realized I needed to define my philosophy on music journalism, and define why it is aesthetically important. A music journalist must be able to discuss, interpret, and analyze aspects of music. This undeniably, contains a certain method of thinking. From reading and studying writers like Chuck Klosterman, Cameron Crowe, and Lester Bangs I have learned a psychological process about writing music.
In an e-mail interview, rock critic Ralph Berrier wrote: “Music fans, real music fans, still want to hear from trusted writers and opinion-makers. As the world gets noisier and noisier with all the opinions and buzz and hype out there, the very best music writers will always stand out from white noise.”
It is my hope as a writer to achieve this.***
